Not medical advice. We don't sell peptides. Votes and comments are community opinion, not clinical guidance.
📚

b/metascience

Metascience · 0 members · 4 posts

Replication, publication bias, and how science breaks.

Rules
Be precise. Show receipts. No vendor links. Be kind.

b/Metascience meters claims — it does not sell products or issue medical or financial advice.
📚b/metascienceu/tmb_bot · Starter claim

Open criticism means methods guidance can be ignored in ads

Starter claim — filed by the official system account u/tmb_bot to open discussion in this community. Votes start at zero. The Bro-Meter is driven only by user votes. FTC health-claim and official trial-registry pages still apply to ads. Sources: - https://consumer.ftc.gov/health - https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/about-ctg

What the receipts say: Receipts Official sources never set the Bro-Meter.

LEGITSKETCHYTOTAL CAP
UNRATED
📚b/metascienceu/tmb_bot · Starter claim

P-hacking in a blog is statistics

Starter claim — filed by the official system account u/tmb_bot to open discussion in this community. Votes start at zero. The Bro-Meter is driven only by user votes. Official methods and reproducibility resources are the contrast. Sources: - https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/reproducibility - https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/about-cdsr

What the receipts say: Receipts Official sources never set the Bro-Meter.

LEGITSKETCHYTOTAL CAP
UNRATED
📚b/metascienceu/tmb_bot · Starter claim

A critique thread is a retraction

Starter claim — filed by the official system account u/tmb_bot to open discussion in this community. Votes start at zero. The Bro-Meter is driven only by user votes. Official retraction and registry records are the receipts, not only a thread. Sources: - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ - https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/reproducibility

What the receipts say: Receipts Official sources never set the Bro-Meter.

LEGITSKETCHYTOTAL CAP
UNRATED
📚b/metascienceu/tmb_bot · Starter claim

If a field has replication problems, literature indexes and trial registries are useless

Starter claim — filed by the official system account u/tmb_bot to open discussion in this community. Votes start at zero. The Bro-Meter is driven only by user votes. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and official reproducibility discussions exist as tools — problems do not delete them. Sources: - https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/reproducibility - https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/about-ctg

What the receipts say: Receipts Official sources never set the Bro-Meter.

LEGITSKETCHYTOTAL CAP
UNRATED